|

|
One of the most important considerations you will have,
when looking at automatic gate operators, is that of SAFETY.
The following information will help you understand what the industry in general,
and GTO specifically, is doing about gate operator safety and why all GTO
operaors are systems certified by ETL to be in compliance with UL 325 5th
edition. Quality and safety should be high priorities to manufacturers of gate
operators, but it is your responsibility to learn the facts in order to protect
end users and reduce legal liability.
Automatic vehicular gate operating systems provide
convenience and security to the end user. In some applications, gate operators
must use high levels of force to move gates. If a system is not properly
specified, installed, used and maintained, serious injuries or death can result
to someone in the vicinity of a moving gate.
Some situations that can lead to a possibility of serious injuries or
death include:
- absence of controlled pedestrian
access;
- absence of type B2 secondary means of
protection against entrapment;
(i.e. safety edges and photo beams. )
- reaching through a gate to operate the
system;
- attempting to climb under, over or
through a gate or the area covered by the travel of the gate;
- children playing on, or near the
vicinity of, the gate;
- physical failure of
gate supporting hardware, or
- absence of physical stops, which may
allow a gate to “overtravel” or fall down;
- unsafe gate designs that have large
openings, exposed rollers, and/or an absence of necessary entrapment
protection devices;
- unsafe installations where access
control devices or pedestrian access areas have been located within reach of
the moving gate;
- untrained individuals attempting to
adjust, repair or perform maintenance on a gate system.
back
Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., a not-for profit
organization established in 1894, is self-described as “the leading
third-party certification organization in the United States and the largest in
North America.”
What is a UL Standard? UL standards are
voluntary standards that establish minimum requirements and are developed via an
open, nonexclusionary process. The purpose of this process is to gain a wider
acceptance of a specific standard. The canvass process typically includes
interested individuals and organizations that may have direct or material
interest in a particular standard. UL 325 is one of the standards that have
attained the ANSI (American National Standards Institute) designation.
How is UL 325 Used? UL 325 is used as a
basis to test products at a nationally recognized testing laboratory. All GTO
gate operators have been tested and found to be in compliance with the UL 325
standard, 5th edition, therefore, they are “Listed” and have received a
“Mark.”
back
(Gate, Operators and Systems) makes explicit
considerations for the entrapment of persons in automatic gate systems. These
revisions mandate specific requirements of gate operator installers,
distributors and manufacturers with serious repercussions in liability and
potential legal recourse. But what exactly these repercussions are and to whom
they apply has been the subject of substantial controversy and considerable
contradictory information now circulates throughout the industry. Some
erroneously believe that compliance with UL 325 is not mandatory until the
American National Standards Institute (ANSI) adopts the standard. Others
maintain that compliance with UL 325 is completely voluntary unless a federal,
state or local law mandates the standard. But when it comes to gate operators
destined for employee workplaces, nothing could be further from the truth. The
intent of this article is to close the door on the controversy surrounding UL
325 and set the record straight on its immediate implications for fence and gate
professionals.
back
The Straight Facts About Gate Operator Compliance
March 1, 2000, the effective date for Underwriters Laboratories Standard 325 (UL
325) Fifth Edition, marked a milestone in the fence and gate industry. However,
the true implications of that milestone remain in ongoing debate among industry
analysts and experts. In response to recent automatic gate-related injuries and
fatalities, UL 325 Fifth Edition (Door, Drapery, Gate, Louver and Window
Operators and Systems) makes explicit considerations for the entrapment of
persons in automatic gate systems. These revisions mandate specific requirements
of gate operator installers, distributors and manufacturers with serious
repercussions in liability and potential legal recourse. But what exactly these
repercussions are and to whom they apply has been the subject of substantial
controversy and considerable contradictory information now circulates throughout
the industry.
Some erroneously believe that compliance with UL 325 is not mandatory until the
American National Standards Institute (ANSI) adopts the standard. Others
maintain that compliance with UL 325 is completely voluntary unless a federal,
state or local law mandates the standard. But when it comes to gate operators
destined for employee workplaces, nothing could be further from the truth. The
intent of this article is to close the door on the controversy surrounding UL
325 and set the record straight on its immediate implications for fence and gate
professionals.
What Can An NRTL Do For Me?
Simply put, a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL) is an independent
laboratory accredited by OSHA to test products to the specifications of all
applicable recognized product safety standards - such as those from UL and other
standards-writing bodies. Their function is to provide an independent
evaluation, testing and certification of any electrically operated product.
Intertek Testing Services, NA, (ITS) which issues the ETL Product Safety
Certification Mark, is recognized as an NRTL in the United States and, in a
similar capacity, as a Certifying Organization (CO) in Canada and a Notified
Body in Europe.
In the midst of the industry's confusion, many distributors, manufacturers and
end users may not be aware that under the provisions of Federal Law 29 CFR
1910.399, OSHA requires gate operators to be certified compliant to UL 325 for
employee workplaces. As experts in the field of product safety testing and
certification, an NRTL like ITS possesses the unparalleled knowledge of current
product safety standards to ensure that the products you manufacture, distribute
or install are in full compliance - protecting your assets and mitigating your
liability. In addition to required testing for UL 325 compliance, it is
important to note that dealers installing gate operators should be aware that
The National Electrical Code (NFPA 70) may also require that electrical
equipment, such as gate operators or light fixtures, be NRTL approved. An OSHA-accredited
NRTL can be a powerful ally - safeguarding your business and protecting you from
unwarranted blame.
back
The fact of the matter is that under Federal Law 29 CFR
1910.399, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requires that
all electrical equipment used in employee workplaces be listed, labeled, and
system-certified by a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL). The
equipment in question must meet all applicable product safety standards which,
for gate operators, would be UL 325 Fifth Edition. This means that without
exception, all gate operators and gate operating equipment destined for employee
workplaces must be tested and certified to the specifications of UL 325. While
compliance to the revised standard remains voluntary for residential
applications, it is important to note that in certain situations (a gardening
service on the premises, a routine maintenance visit by an HVAC professional)
OSHA may consider a residential environment a workplace environment -
transferring the same legal requirements and liability to what was believed to
be an "indemnified" gate system. In addition, given the recent
scrutiny of the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), it is highly likely
that the standard will eventually become mandatory for residential applications.
So, for the moment, while residential systems' compliance to UL 325 certainly
makes excellent business sense from a liability perspective, in business
settings it is the absolute letter of the law as far as OSHA is concerned.
Specifically, gate operator control mechanisms along with the integral wiring
systems are covered by UL 325 Fifth Edition. In some cases, additional testing
for performance certification will be required under standard UL 991 which is
cross-referenced in UL 325. Under UL 991, the controls will be separately
evaluated for their applicable use. It is important to note that simply using
listed components within a gate operator will not by default produce a listed
gate operator system. Some manufacturers, despite using recognized components
and listed products, are still unable to secure product listing for the
collective system because they do not meet all the safety and performance
requirements of the standard.
back
What Are the Certification Marks & What Do
They Mean?
As proof that a product has been tested and certified to the specifications of
accepted standards, NRTLs issue Certification Marks to product manufacturers. A
single NRTL can provide many different certification marks, with differing
levels of significance for each. ITS' ETL Listed Mark is denoted by the word
"listed" appearing directly below the letters within the Mark. A
control number can also be found directly below the word "listed"
along with an indication of the standard to which the product has been tested
and certified. This Mark, along with other means of identification, will
identify gate operator hardware and components as being listed for their
applicable use.
Some manufacturers may claim that their products comply with UL 325 Fifth
Edition, but unless certified by an independent NRTL they cannot bear the
appropriate Certification Mark. The United States currently offers no options
for manufacturers to "self certify" their products. In addition to the
initial product evaluation conducted by the NRTL, manufacturers must agree to
follow-up inspections of their manufacturing process every 90 days to ensure
ongoing compliance with the standard.
back
Given the confusion over this issue, it is extremely
important that all involved parties understand the consequences of installing,
manufacturing, or distributing unlisted/uncertified gate operator hardware for
employee workplaces. Recent injuries and fatalities have brought great attention
to the industry and given the severity of these incidents it is highly unlikely
that this scrutiny will subside. In a July 27, 1999 memorandum, The CPSC reports
that from 1990-1998 an estimated 6,800 injuries (or 755 injuries per year) were
related to automatic gates. Among those incidents, there were 28 automatic
gate-related deaths during the same time period, involving victims from 17
months to 60 years old.
The penalties for non-compliance? Under
Federal Law 29 CFR 1910.399 Section 17A, OSHA has the authority to impose a fine
of $70,000 per piece of non-certified equipment, and under Section 17E OSHA may
impose a jail sentence of up to six months. Section 17G allows additional fines
and even imprisonment for parties found guilty of false certification. And
what's more, these fines and penalties set in motion a sequence of litigation
cascading from the end user to the original equipment manufacturer. One way or
another, everyone pays the price for non-compliance. With the threat of such
heavy fines and penalties, it is in the best interests of all fence and gate
professionals to protect themselves from liability and understand the immediate
ramifications of UL 325 Fifth Edition.
back
To minimize your liability, reduce the risk of local
inspector rejections and ensure compliance with all OSHA federal laws, your
system specifications should require NRTL system certification to UL 325 Fifth
Edition. To ensure the highest level of protection, your system components
should be tested, certified, listed and labeled by the original equipment
manufacturer before they leave the production facility. Anything less
unnecessarily jeopardizes both your business and the individuals who use your
products. For additional information please visit the ITS web site at
www.etlsemko.com
Avoid the Nightmare of Being Sued
When it comes to product safety, manufacturers must defend themselves on two
fronts. First, one must avoid prosecution for violating the law. In the U.S.
workplace electrical safety laws are set by OSHA. A product safety listing, as
indicated by the ETL Listed Mark, satisfies that law. But product safety
violations can mean more than just federal prosecution. You can also be sued by
a user who has been injured by your product. Here too, having an ETL Listed
product may make a difference. For example, when a plaintiff's attorney can
point to an existing ANSI/UL standard and show that the product did not meet
that standard, and that lack of compliance caused the injury, he can justifiably
claim that the design was defective. The standard of care imposed on the
manufacturer rests, to at least some degree, on the practices that are
widespread throughout the industry. ANSI/UL standards exist by virtue of
industry consensus, and, therefore, represent powerful evidence of the standards
to which manufacturers themselves have consented to comply. Finally, where
meeting safety standards is mandatory under the law, violation of those
standards implies a "negligence per se" rule. In such cases, there is
no question about negligence-the only question is how much the manufacturer must
pay.
back
|